-
Introduction
-
Cross-cutting themes
-
Sectors
Measurement and Standards
Measurement and characterisation (metrology)
The development of nanotechnologies cannot advance without the ability to measure and characterise nanoscale materials, objects and devices in an accurate, reliable and repeatable way. Such measurement and characterisation must take account of the shape, size, physical, chemical and biological properties of nanoscale materials.
The UK is in the forefront of developing the necessary techniques and methods, with the Government funding a large programme of work through the National Measurement System.
A key early success was the establishment at the National Physical Laboratory of a facility focussed on the detection and measurement of airborne nanoparticles. This led to the launch of the world’s first accredited calibration service for airborne nanoparticle concentration. This service underpins nanoparticle number concentration measurements in the UK for both environmental and workplace monitoring and supports industrial innovation in important areas such as engine and vehicle development where reductions in particle emissions are essential to compliance with new regulations.
Current airborne particulate research is tackling fundamental issues such as -
- Detection of engineered nanoparticles against background levels of naturally occurring nanoparticles; and
- Measurement of important characteristics of airborne nanoparticles such as size and surface area.
Detecting nanoparticles in water, sediment, soils and human and animal tissue is much more difficult and the reproducible determination of even simple characteristics such as the size distribution of nanoparticles is a substantial challenge. Currently, work is underway to fully understand the measurement issues that need to be resolved and to start to develop the underpinning metrology.
The UK is one of the leaders in international nanometrology having led the establishment of the ISO standards committee (TC229) for nanotechnologies as well as being engaged in many other activities. The biggest market opportunities for UK companies are overseas and much of today’s regulatory regime originates from Europe or from other international requirements. As such, the UK is engaged in international activities to:
- Ensure that measurements made in the UK are accepted as equivalent to those made across the world, preventing barriers to trade;
- Defend UK interests in international arenas where measurement standards can be key to product acceptance or for regulatory compliance;
- Fulfil the UK’s commitments to international bodies and treaties;
- Work for the development of effective and proportionate environmental and health and safety regulations to protect the UK population and environment.
Support for innovation is one of the top drivers for the work of the National Measurement System. Established links across many sectors of industry such as building products, catalysts, instrumentation, medical devices, packaging, pharmaceuticals and textiles are used to exchange knowledge to drive improvements in products and processes. Strong relationships with Universities, EPSRC and Technology Strategy Board are also important mechanisms for leveraging the results of academic research into practical applications.
The rapid adoption of nanotechnology in almost all industrial sectors presents enormous challenges for nanometrology in the UK due to:
- The need to support industry by:
- Enabling innovation and enhancing value;
- Underpinning effective quality and process control during manufacturing;
- Shortening the product development time before market launch;
- The essential requirement to underpin development and implementation of an efficient and effective regulatory regime for:
- Environmental monitoring;
- Workplace Health and Safety;
- Toxicological testing;
- Consumer and product safety.
Meeting the nanometrology challenge, given the urgent need for answers particularly on the environmental, health and safety issues, is a major issue. Given the very limited resources available, expertise and research from across the UK and beyond is being utilised to assist but there remains an urgent requirement for more support to develop the measurement infrastructure and reference materials in this area.
Standards
In a global market, it is important that there is a common understanding of what is meant by nanotechnologies and associated terms and agreement on how nanoscale materials should be measured, described and evaluated for their health and environmental impacts. To this end, the UK is playing a leading role in international standardisation activities.
Standards are not part of the regulatory framework but can and do support regulation. Standards apply to virtually every aspect of our lives, from the highly innovative such as internet protocols to the more mundane such as shoe sizes. National and international trade depends on standards. Although voluntary, they are used because they provide a reliable and validated basis for best practice.
Early participation in standards-making allows countries and organisations to help create and shape markets by providing the bench-mark for others, and can provide valuable technical and business intelligence. The early development of standards is particularly important in technically challenging, strategically and globally important areas such as nanotechnologies.
The UK was the first country to establish a national standards committee on nanotechnologies, in June 2004 and has published 11 standards. The UK has also secured the secretariats and chairmanships of technical committees in both the International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
This work has led to a number of internationally reviewed standards for nanotechnologies, covering areas such as nanoparticle terminology and guides to safe handling and disposal, and labelling. This initial stage of standards work is establishing important international agreements that give confidence that for example, how nanoparticles are described and labelled will be identical across the world. This is important in areas such as the safety of product shipments, handling and manufacturing of products. Future work will build on these foundations to establish standards that will underpin workplace and environmental safety and develop measurement standards for the physical and chemical characteristics of the many different classes of nanoparticles.
Your views
We would welcome your views on how the UK can development and exploit excellence in measurement and standards of nanotechnologies. The SWOT analysis below summarises Government understanding, from discussion with stakeholders, of the major strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the UK in this area. This (and the questions to the right hand side) is intended to help you think about the issues and steer future actions and shape the UK nano environment.
Strengths
The UK Government attaches great importance to the development of measurement expertise and equipment. As well as funding work in the UK National Measurement System, it supports the development of underpinning skills and equipment for academic research. The UK’s leading role in international standardisation enables it to maintain a position at the leading edge of technical and commercial developments and to represent and defend UK interests.
Weaknesses
The UK has not invested in a focused programme of work to address the many EHS concerns that have been raised and as a result progress is limited and erratic. The UK spends less than its principal competitors such as the USA and Japan and the capacity and availability of qualified nano-metrologists is limited in key areas. If industry is to be able to measure and characterise nanomaterials, the pull-through of expertise to industry needs improving.
Opportunities
Investment in measurement and standards will provide an environment and international markets where commercialisation of UK developed nanotechnologies products can flourish. The UK has a strong instrumentation sector that is well placed to take up and successfully exploit developments in the detection and monitoring of nanomaterials.
By maintaining our position at the forefront of nanotechnologies standardization, the UK should be well placed to take full advantage of anticipatory standards developments, recognised as being an effective tool for, and enabler of innovation. The UK should also be well-placed to help secure critical opportunities to compete effectively in an increasingly aggressive global market.
Threats
Possible reductions in UK Government support for measurement research could have an impact on the UK’s leading role in nanotechnology standardisation.
There is strong competition from the USA, Germany, China and Japan and UK businesses could become uncompetitive if the industry fails to develop the expertise to measure and characterise nanomaterials. Without standardised measurements, we will not be able to implement an efficient and effective regulatory regime.

The Environment Agency agrees that an effective environmental regulatory regime will require the development of robust techniques to –
• characterise nanomaterials in a standardised way
• test nanomaterials in appropriate manners and relevant test systems
• monitor quantities and effects of nanomaterials entering the environment (particularly water, sediments, soils and biota).
Environmental monitoring is stated to be an integral objective underpinning regulation, and was highlighted in the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution’s report as an obligation that should fall to the Environment Agency in England and Wales. However, there appear to be no current proposals as to how this might be achieved other than work within the Environmental Nanoscience Initiative, which is funded at a relatively modest level given the enormity of the task, in the UK. While the work to develop standards is welcome, we believe major research into monitoring tools should be initiated as soon as possible regardless of which body will monitor the environment for nanomaterials. There are very few, if any, techniques for monitoring nanomaterials in the environment beyond the coupling of simple chemical analysis and sophisticated laboratory imaging techniques. We do not believe this approach is a practical way forward.
We do not have the resources to develop and undertake monitoring programmes for a wide range of different nanomaterials. We believe monitoring should be prioritised on those materials likely to pose the greatest hazard and/or risk to the environment. This requires knowledge on the types of materials being produced and released – see our earlier comments on “Anticipating Opportunities and Concerns” and “Managing Risks and Uncertainties”). In addition, we believe current monitoring programmes are likely to require considerable modification to detect even a small range of different nanomaterials. This will have significant cost implications, above and beyond the investment required to develop and validate the monitoring tools themselves.
Comment by Environment Agency — October 30, 2009 @ 5:40 pm